Tuesday, 18 June 2013

THREE HEADS - A JEN STORY -15

மூன்று தலைகள்! – ஜென் கதைகள் -15


மாமன்னர் அசோகர் குடிமைப் பணிகளைப் பார்வையிட்டு அரண்மனை திரும்பிக் கொண்டிருந்தார். போரே வேண்டாம்… போரே மன்னனின் தொழில்  என்றிருந்த அவர் புத்தரின் பாதையில் அன்பு வழி போதும் என மனதளவில் மாற்றம் அடைந்திருந்த நேரம்!
இப்போது அவருக்கு எதிரில் வந்து கொண்டிருந்த ஒரு வயோதிக துறவியும் அவரது சீடர்களும் மன்னருக்கு வழிவிட்டு ஒதுங்கி நின்றனர்.
அசோகரின் பார்வை ஒதுங்கி நின்ற துறவி மீது பட்டது.  உடனே தமது ரதத்தை நிறுத்திவிட்டு இறங்கிச் சென்று புத்த பிக்ஷுவின் காலில் நெடுஞ்சாண்கிடையாக விழுந்தார். அவரது முடி துறவியின் காலில் பட்டது.
ஒரு புன்னகையுடன் துறவி தமது கைகளை உயர்த்தி மன்னனை ஆசீர்வதித்தார். இதைப் பார்த்துக் கொண்டிருந்த அமைச்சருக்கு ஒரே சங்கடம்.
‘எத்தனை பெரிய ராஜ்ஜியத்தின் அதிபதி… உலகமே வியக்கும் ஒரு பேரரசன் போயும் போயும் இந்த பரதேசியின் காலில் விழுந்து, முடியை வேறு காலில் பட வைத்துவிட்டாரே!’ என்ற நினைத்து உள்ளுக்குள் கொஞ்சம் கோபமும் எரிச்சலும் அடைந்தார்.
அரண்மனை சென்றதுமே அசோகரிடம் தனது வருத்தத்தை வெளிப்படுத்தினார். அமைச்சரின் பேச்சைக் கேட்ட மன்னர் சிரித்தார். ஆனால் அமைச்சரின் கேள்விக்குப் பதிலளிக்கவில்லை. அவரிடமிருந்து ஒரு விசித்திர உத்தரவு வந்தது அமைச்சருக்கு.
“மந்திரியாரே… ஓர் ஆட்டுத் தலை, ஒரு புலித்தலை, ஒரு மனிதத் தலை மூன்றும் எனக்கு உடனே வேண்டும். ஏற்பாடு செய்யுங்கள்” என்றார் மன்னர்.
நாம் சொன்னதென்ன…. இவர் உத்தரவென்ன…. என்ற திகைப்புடன் கட்டளையை சிரமேற்கொண்டு ஏவலாட்களை நாடெங்கும் அனுப்பினார்.
ஆட்டுத் தலைக்கு அதிகம் கஷ்டப்படவில்லை. கறிக்கடையில் கிடைத்துவிட்டது.
புலித்தலைக்கு ரொம்பவே அலைய வேண்டி வந்தது. கடைசியில் ஒரு வேட்டைக்காரனிடம் அது கிடைத்தது.
ஆனால் மனிதத் தலை? உயிரோடிருப்பவனை வெட்டி தலையை எடுத்தால் அது கொலை… என்ன செய்யலாம் என யோசித்தபோது, வழியில் ஒரு சுடுகாடு தென்பட்டது. அங்கே புதைக்கக் கொண்டுவந்த ஒரு பிணத்தில் தலையை எடுத்துக் கொண்டனர்.
மன்னரிடம் கொண்டு போனார்கள். மூன்று தலைகளையும் பார்த்த அசோக மன்னர் தன் அமைச்சரிடம், “சரி, இம்மூன்றையும் சந்தையில் விற்று பொருளாக்கி வாருங்கள்,” என்றார்.
மன்னரின் கட்டளைப்படி சந்தைக்குச் சென்றவர்களுக்கு ஆட்டுத்தலையை விற்பதில் எந்த சிக்கலும் இல்லை. பதிலுக்கு பண்டமும் கிடைத்தது.
புலியின் தலையை வாங்க யாரும் முன் வரவில்லை. பலரும் அதை வேடிக்கைதான் பார்த்தார்கள். கடைசியில் ஒரு பணக்காரர் தன் வேட்டை மாளிகையை அலங்கரிக்க அதை நல்ல விலை கொடுத்து வாங்கிக் கொண்டார்.
இப்போது மனிதத் தலைதான் மிச்சமிருந்தது. அதைப் பார்க்கவே யாரும் விரும்பவில்லை. அருவருத்து ஓடினர். வேறு வழியின்றி மனிதத் தலையுடன் அரண்மனைக்கே திரும்பினர் ஏவலாட்கள்.
மன்னரிடம் போய், விவரத்தைச் சொன்னார் அமைச்சர்.
“அப்படியா… சரி, யாரிடமாவது இலவசமாகக் கொடுத்துவிட்டு வந்துவிடுங்கள்”, என்றார் மன்னர்.
ஒரு நாளெல்லாம் அலைந்தும் இலவசமாகக் கூட அதனை பெற்றுக் கொள்ள யாருமே முன் வரவில்லை.
விஷயத்தைக் கேட்ட அசோக மன்னர் புன்சிரிப்புடன் இப்படிக் கூறினார்:
“மந்திரியாரே… நீங்கள் தெரிந்து கொண்டது என்ன?” என்றார்.
அமைச்சர் மவுனம் காத்தார்.
“மனிதனின் உயிர் போய்விட்டால் இந்த உடம்புக்கு மரியாதை ஏது? சக மனிதன்தானே… வாங்கி வைத்துக் கொள்ளலாம் அல்லவா… ஆனால் நடை முறையில் இலவசமாகக் கொடுத்தாலும் அருவருத்து ஓடுகிறார்கள்…  இதை யாரும் தொடக்கூட மாட்டார்கள்.
இருந்தும் இந்த உடம்பு உயிரும் துடிப்புமாக உள்ளபோது என்ன ஆட்டம் ஆடுகிறது! செத்த பின்பு நமக்கு மதிப்பில்லை என்பது நமக்குத் தெரியும். ஆனால், உடலில் உயிர் இருக்கும்போது. தம்மிடம் எதுவும் இல்லை என்றுணர்ந்தவர்கள்தான் ஞானிகள். அத்தகைய ஞானிகளை விழுந்து வணங்குவதே ஞானத்தைப் பெறும் முதல் வழி..!” என்றார்.
அமைச்சர் தலை கவிழ்ந்து நின்றார்!
-என்வழி ஸ்பெஷல்

A JEN STORY

ஒரு கை ஓசை கேட்குதா! – ஜென் கதைகள் -21
ப்பானில் ஒரு புகழ்பெற்ற ஜென் குரு அவர். அவருக்கு சுவோ என்று ஒரு சீடர். அவர் நல்ல ஆசிரியரும்கூட.
ஒரு கோடையில், ஜப்பானின் தென் தீவிலிருந்து ஒரு மாணவன் வந்தான், தத்துவம் பயில.
அவனை சுவோவிடம் அனுப்பினார் தலைமை குரு. மாணவனுக்கு முதல் பரீட்சை வைத்தார் சுவோ.

“உனக்கு ஒரு கை ஓசை கேட்கிறதா?” – இதுதான் அந்த சோதனை.
அவனுக்குக் கேட்கவில்லை. அந்த சோதனையில் தேர்ந்தால்தான் சுவோவிடம் பயிற்சி பெற முடியும். எனவே ஒரு கை ஓசையைக் கேட்க அவன் காத்திருந்தான்…. வாரக் கணக்கில் அல்ல… மாதக் கணக்கில் அல்ல.. ஆண்டுக் கணக்கில். ஆண்டுகள் மூன்று முழுசாய் ஓடின!
ஒரு இரவில், சுவோவிடம் வந்தான் மாணவன்.
“என்னால் உங்கள் சோதனையில் தேர்ச்சி பெற முடியவில்லை. அவமானம், தர்மசங்கடத்தைச் சுமந்தபடி என் தீவுக்குச் செல்கிறேன்…” என்றான்.
“தம்பி.. அவசரப்படாதே.. இன்னும் ஒரு வாரம் எடுத்துக் கொள். நன்றாக தியானம் செய்..” என்றார் சுவோ.
ஒரு வாரம் கழிந்தது. மாணவனுக்கு ஒரு கை ஓசை கேட்கவே இல்லை. மீண்டும் சுவோவிடம் வந்தான். அவர் “இன்னும் ஒரு வாரம் முயற்சி பண்ணுப்பா” என்றார். ஆனால் அவன் முயற்சிக்கு வெற்றி கிட்டவில்லை.
மேலும் ஒரு வாரம் கெடு கொடுத்தார் சுவோ. அப்போதும் விடை கிடைக்கவில்லை மாணவனுக்கு.
மிகுந்த ஏமாற்றமும் சோர்வுமாக வந்த மாணவன், ‘போதும் குருவே, நான் போகிறேன்’, என்றான்.
சரி, ஒரு ஐந்து நாள் மட்டும் இருந்து பார்த்துவிட்டுப் போ என்றார் சுவோ. அந்த ஐந்து நாட்களில் அவனால் எதையும் உணர முடியவில்லை. மீண்டும் சுவோவிடம் வந்து உதட்டைப் பிதுக்கினான்.
இந்த முறை சுவோ இப்படிச் சொன்னார்:
“சரி, கடைசியாக மூன்று தினங்கள். இந்த மூன்று தினங்களில் உன்னால் இந்த சோதனைக்கான விடையைக் காண முடியாவிட்டால், செத்துப் போ,” என்றார் கண்டிப்பு மிக்க குரலில்.
மாணவன் தன் அறைக்குத் திரும்பினான். இரண்டாம் நாள் வந்தான்.. “குருவே.. ஒரு கை ஓசை கேட்டது… நான் தேடி வந்தது கிடைத்தது,” என்றான்.

Supernatural Creep: The Slippery Slope to Unfalsifiability

I'm taking a step beyond sciencey with the following topic. What happens when science doesn't cooperate with your subject area? Researchers of unexplained events may get frustrated and disenchanted with the scientific process when the eyewitness accounts they collect are too weird to explain via conventional means. They go unconventional.
shadowy monster with glowing eyes
Captain Jean-Baptiste Duhamel led the hunt for a beast that was attacking and devouring victims in the Gevaudan, France, in 1794. He had a problem. He could not catch and kill the man-eating monster. Being a proud man, he had to justify why he could not conquer this particular foe. Since the option that he was an inadequate huntsman was not acceptable, the creature must be supernatural in its abilities to escape his capture. The characteristics of the beast were exaggerated—it was huge, cunning, and not just an ordinary wolf. Captain Duhamel left defeated by what must truly be an extraordinary beast.
The cognitive dissonance experienced by the French captain is reflected today by those who can't capture Bigfoot. When normal processes and causes fail to satisfactorily explain events or answers to questions, then the reasoning slips beyond nature, into super nature, beyond the testable claims of science.
I call this "supernatural creep." Although, I swear I'm not the first one to name it as such. I searched to find where I have seen this referenced before. (If anyone knows, please email me so I can give the originator due credit.) Once I noticed this kind of reasoning, I saw it frequently. Wherever I come across this concept, it reveals a bit about human nature:
If you have to choose between the belief or a rational explanation, the rational explanation may be that which gets rejected.
black dog monster
The effect of supernatural creep can be seen with UFOs, anomalous natural phenomena (Fortean topics), and in bizarre stories categorized as "high strangeness" (which I'll explain a bit further on in this piece). A perfect example is that of "black dogs" whose appearance is spectral or demonic and is associated with either protection from or nearness of bad spirits. Could it be just a big black dog? Witnesses perceive that it's more than that. When the circumstances feel uncanny, we slip into thoughts of the supernatural. An enjoyable book that illustrates supernatural creep quite nicely is Three Men Seeking Monsters by Nick Redfern. Fun stuff.
With phantom black dogs, there is a connection to local legends and ghost stories. A modern example of the dispute about supernatural creep is evident in the Bigfoot/Sasquatch community.
Bigfoot proponents generally fall into two camps: those who search for a real animal that functions as nature intended (called 'apers') and those who entertain the option that the entity is not natural (paranormalists).
In their 2006 book, The Yowie: In Search of Australia's Bigfoot, authors Tony Healy and Paul Cropper appear to have a parting of the ways when trying to explain all the Yowie accounts at face value—some of which, like our American Bigfoot are pretty bizarre. What is up with an animal that is sometimes described as having three toes, sometimes four or five? And, after all this time, why can't we trap one or find a body? The creature has a stupendous ability to escape human grasp by eluding our cameras and leaving only tenuous, dubious traces of its corporeal existence. It can run outrageously fast and may be able to see infrared light. With the Yowie, we can't think of a way to get a wild man on the island continent. It seems so implausible. But as Healy and Cropper note, it's uncomfortable to explain the Yowie as a paranormal entity, perhaps as a psychic phenomenon, because it results in replacing one mystery with another.
monster with arms, wings, and glowing eyes
Characteristics of hairy hominids or other unidentified cryptids may be just marginally odd—avoiding detection for decades among people, expert at hiding in plain sight, unusually developed senses of hearing or sight, fantastic strength or incredible speed. Or, they may get a bit spooky—glowing eyes, inability to be photographed, immunity to bullets, seen everywhere but found nowhere. They get to the point where it's beyond natural—telepathy, shape-shifting, apporting or dis-apporting, signaling illness or death. In the case of some monster sightings, they are associated with UFO sightings, sychronicities, and time loss or distortion.
In order to hang on to the literal interpretation of eyewitness accounts, researchers may take tiny steps away from a purely natural explanation of their quarry. If the animal is shot at close range, why is it not injured or killed? Instead of questioning the story (or the marksmanship of the gunman), the assumption is that the thing must have some extra quality like bullet-proof skin, or perhaps it is impervious to bullets. If these stories are regarded as valid, and more like it come along, instead of doubting the witness, the researcher concludes there must be something paranormal going on to explain it.
The slip down the supernatural slope is really apparent when there are accounts of "high strangeness"—mind-boggling stories that have absurd elements. This term was originally used by Dr. J. Allen Hynek to describe extremely peculiar UFO cases that appeared to be associated with dream-like details, such as mysterious phone calls, electronic glitches, and Men in Black visits. If a report is one of "high strangeness," it's more than the typical "I saw a UFO" or "I saw a Bigfoot" story. It turns into a "I saw a Bigfoot go into a UFO" story—a whole other level of weirdness that now strains a natural explanation, if true.
And so it goes with Bigfooters. I recently read a blog post about a person who was rejected from the Bigfoot Field Research Organization (BRFO) because he dared mention a telepathic experience related to a Bigfoot encounter. There are Bigfoot researchers who discard reports that involve any paranormal or supernatural element because it sounds less credible to admit such ideas if they wish their work to be taken seriously. (This is a bit weird for the BFRO, I thought, since Matt Moneymaker ascribes some incredibly bizarre, paranormal talents to Bigfoot like the ability to "stun" people and immobilize them. I can't take his speculations seriously.)
In my last Sounds Sciencey post, I noted that it appeared that the ghost investigation field seemed to be moving away from the sciencey focus and more into the supernatural, dealing with demons, angels, and religious qualities of hauntings. Science is failing them, as well. In order to retain that important core that ghosts, or whatever X-file, is real, the natural explanations are no longer suitable as explanations; it must be something beyond human understanding. The cryptozoological community is sliding down a similar path at the behest of authors like Redfern who think that the field should expand to include "zooform" phenomena—entities, not actual animals, that appear in animal form. This would constitute a shift from scientific inquiry to a completely experienced-based view. How convenient. You gain great flexibility when you discount natural laws.
You may be able to see the immediate problem with an experience-based view and accounts of high strangeness. Since many skeptical paranormal researchers are very aware of the problems with eyewitness accounts, we notice the mistake certain non-skeptical researchers make when reading popular accounts of local tales or Charles Fort’s collection of books. The writers take every detail of the witness at face value! We know, however, that people mess up observations. We know that our memories are flawed, and we know that stories change over time, often becoming very different from the original account. Stories are poor evidence. To build a conclusion on just these story elements means that you must reject the foundation of knowledge we already have about how the world works (which is pretty well tested) and accept that there are visitors from other dimensions harassing our rural population or that we are able to conjure up monsters just with our collective mind power. That’s absurd. I’ll need more than a few good stories to accept that.
Supernatural creep is the way researchers hold onto their cherished ideas that a mysterious phenomenon, as they perceive it, is really out there. Being too invested in the idea to let it go, they reinvent reality instead.
By the way, the Beast of the Gevaudan? It was wolves. They were only unusual in that they were really hungry and good at catching people and not getting caught themselves. They were eventually dispatched. But the legend remains of the monsters of the Gevaudan. It's too good of a story to give up.

References

Bord, Janet and Colin. 1981. Alien Animals. Stackpole Books.
Healy, T. and P. Cropper. 2006. The Yowie: In Search of Australia's Bigfoot. Anomalist Books.
Redfern, Nick. 2004. Three Men Seeking Monsters. Paraview Pocket Books.
Smith, Jay M. 2011. Monsters of the Gevaudan: The Making of a Beast. Harvard University Press.

Sharon Hill

Sharon Hill's photo
Sharon Hill specializes in issues of science and the public and runs theDoubtful News website. Sharon can be reached atshill@centerforinquiry.net.



HISTORICAL RAMA: The Hindu History of Ancient INDIA

APPARSWAMI AND HIS HYMNS

TIRUNĀVUKKARASU SWĀMI
(More commonly referred to as APPARSWĀMI)
Sambandar, whose works we have been studying, had a friend older than himself, named Appar, or Tirunāvukkarasu, belonging to that Veḷḷāla caste which to this day makes a very solid element in the population of the Tamil country. Left an orphan at an early age, Appar was brought up by a loving elder sister as a pious devotee of Śiva. Great was the sister's grief when Appar forsook the faith of his fathers and became a religious teacher among the Janis. But her earnest prayers at last prevailed, and Appar not only came back to Śaivism himself, but was the means of reconverting to Śaivism the king of his country. His full name was Tirunāvukkarasu, or 'King of the Tongue', but his young friend Sambandar called him Appār, or Father, and the name stuck to him. He too wandered throughout the Tamil country, sometimes alone, sometimes in company with Sambandar, singing his way from shrine to shrine. Pictures show him holding in his hand a little tool for scraping grass, with which he used to scrape the stones of the temple courts. The Jains persecuted him, and many stories tell of his miraculous escapes from their hands.
p. 37
His hymns show a truly religious nature, with a deep-rooted sense of sin and need, and an exalted joy in God. There is real critical acumen in the old epigram which represents Śiva as appraising the three great writers of the Dēvāram, or Śaivite hymn-book: "Sambandar praised himself; Sundarar praised Me for pelf; My Appar praised Me Myself."
p. 38 p. 39
God, the essentially unsearchable, in His grace will reveal Himself to men. (See the first of the legends told in the Introduction.) Athihai Viraṭṭānam, in the South Arcot District, is the shrine here commemorated.
25. Vishu, spouse of Lakshmi, and four-ways-facing Brahm,
   Searched the heights and depths, but Thy feet could never sec.
Yet, O only Lord, who in Athihai dost dwell,
   Formless, in Thy grace, grant the sight of them to me.

The notable thing about our next verse is not so much the legend of the crushing of Rāvaa, who tried to storm the mountain Kailāsa, where Śiva had His heaven, but rather the thought of the devotee being stamped as the property of his god, a thought which recurs in other hymns. According to tradition Apparswami did receive the Hindu equivalent of St. Francis’ stigmata, the mark of Śiva's bull as if branded on his body. We cannot help recalling St. Paul's expression in Galatians vi. 17.
26. All other worlds his sceptre swayed,
  But when Kailāsa he would rule
Thy crushing foot presumption paid.
  O stamp me with. Thy sacred bull,
White as Himāl’ya's snowy hill.
  Accent me, O our truth divine,
There where the moon outsoareth still
  Groves of Tū
gānaimāam's shrine.
p. 40 p. 41
Here is the divine vision as the enraptured Śaivite sees it.
27. See, there His bright trident appears to me;
  See, there is the moon in His tangled hair;
His garland of flowers from the kondai tree,
  And the ear-ring white in His either ear,
The cloak that He tore from the elephant wild,
  His glittering crown and His body's sheen.
Ash-smeared, He is ever the undefiled,
  In Pūva
am circled by groves all green.

The singer, standing at the shrine of Tiruvalur (Ārūr) in the Tanjore district, muses over the ancient connection of his lord with the holy place, suggesting that it began before the creation, before Śiva wrought his greatest marvels, perhaps even before the one Supreme, Īśvara, expanded into the triad Brahmā, Vishu and Rudra.
28. When was that ancient day our Lord
  Chose Ārūr should His temple be?
Was’t when He stood ’mid praising worlds
  Alone, or when the One grew three?
Was’t when in wrath He burned up Death,
  Or turned on Lust His flaming eye?
Or when creative, immanent,
  He called to being earth and sky?
Was’t when, his young deer in his hand,
  He came, with Umā as His part?
Or ere He joined that lady fair
  Took He our Ārūr to His heart?
p. 42 p. 43
It is often said, not without truth, that Hinduism fails to create a strong sense of sin. But there are great exceptions: witness the following verses, samples of many, taken from a hymn which trembles with feeling. The author is sunk in sin. Or he has been like a swing, flying first toward evil and then towards God; but now, joy! the cord has snapped, and he lies fixed at his Lord's feet. Yet the old mood returns; his soul is bound and drugged with sleep, and life has no joys to offer unless God will save.
The Soul's Bitter Cry
29. In right I have no power to live,
  Day after day I'm stained with sin;
I read, but do not understand;
  I hold Thee not my heart within.
O light, O flame, O first of all,
  I wandered far that I might see,
Athihai Vīra
ṭṭānam's Lord,
  Thy flower-like feet of purity.
30. Daily I'm sunk in worldly sin;
  Naught know I as I ought to know;
Absorbed in vice as ’twere my kin,
  I see no path in which to go.
O Thou with throat one darkling gem,
  Gracious, such grace to me accord,
That I may see Thy beauteous feet,
  Athihai Vīra
ṭṭānam's Lord.
31. My fickle heart one love forsakes,
  And forthwith to some other clings;
Swiftly to some one thing it sways,
  And e’en as swiftly backward swings.
O Thou with crescent in Thy hair,
  Athihai Vīra
ṭṭānam's Lord,
Fixed at Thy feet henceforth I lie,
  For Thou hast broken my soul's cord.
p. 44 p. 45
32. The bond of lust I cannot break;
  Desire's fierce torture will not die;
My soul I cannot stab awake
  To scan my flesh with seeing eye.
I bear upon me load of deeds,
  Load such as I can ne’er lay down.
Athihai Vīra
ṭṭānam's Lord,
  Weary of joyless life I've grown.

Fresh pictures in another hymn set forth his sad condition. God's vessels are full of the sweetness of grace, but his spoon has no handle. He feels himself in the deadly grasp of fate, like the frog in the cruel mouth of the snake which is slowly swallowing it down. Or he is on a raft on the sea of life, wrecked on the rock of lust.
33. While violence is in my heart,
  Care of my body cage is vain.
My spoon no handle hath when I
  Thy honey's grace to drink am fain.
As in the serpent's mouth the frog,
  Caught in life's terrors, wild I rave.
Thou, King of holy Ottiyūr,
  Wilt Thou not care for me and save?
34. When on life's angry waves I launch,
  My heart's the raft I take to me,
My mind's the pole I lean upon,
  Vexation's freight I bear to sea.
I strike upon the rock of lust!
  O then, though witless quite I he,
Grant, King of holy Ottiyūr,
  Such wisdom that I think of Thee.
p. 46 p. 47
It would be hard to find a more comprehensive confession of sin than our next stanza from another hymn.
35. Evil, all evil, my race, evil my qualities all,
Great am I only in sin, evil is even my good.
Evil my innermost self, foolish, avoiding the pure,
Beast am I not, yet the ways of the beast I can never forsake.
I can exhort with strong words, telling men what they should hate,
Yet can I never give gifts, only to beg them I know.
Ah! wretched man that I am, whereunto came I to birth?

We give next a series of stanzas in various metres from different hymns, in which the saint utters in song some of the joy which his religion has brought him. God has revealed mysteries to him which tongue cannot tell, and dwells in his life's innermost places. God is to him the fabled katpaha tree, supplying his every need. God is his all in all, and His presence is sweeter than melody or evening moonlight.
36. The moving water He made stand unmoving in His hair;
  And He my thoughtless heart hath fixed it thought of Him alone:
He taught me that which none can learn, what none can see laid bare;
  What tongue tells not He told; me He pursuer and made His own.
    The spotless pure, the holy One, my fell disease He healed,
    And in Pūnturutti to me e’en me, Himself revealed.
p. 48 p. 49
37. O wealth, my treasure, sweetness, lustre fair of heavenly hosts,
  Of lustre glory that excels, embodied One, my kin,
My flesh, yea heart within my flesh, image within my heart,
  My all-bestowing tree, my eye, pupil my eye within,
Picture seen in that pupil, lord of Ā
utuai cool,
  Immortals’ king, keep far from me strong pain of fruits of sin.
38. Thou to me art parents, Lord,
  Thou all kinsmen that I need,
Thou to me art loved ones fair,
  Thou art treasure rich indeed.
Family, friends, home art Thou,
  Life and joy I draw from Thee,
False world's good by Thee I leave,
  Gold, pearl, wealth art Thou to me.
39. As the vīa's pure sound, as the moonlight at even,
  As the south wind's soft breath, as the spring's growing heat,
As the pool hovered over by whispering bees,
  So sweet is the shade at our Father-Lord's feet.
p. 50 p. 51
40. No man holds sway o’er us,
  Nor death nor hell fear we;
No tremblings, griefs of mind,
  No pains nor cringings see.
Joy, day by day, unchanged
  Is ours, for we are His,
His ever, who doth reign,
  Our Śa
kara, in bliss.
Here to His feet we've come,
  Feet as plucked flow’re’ts fair;
See how His ears divine
  Ring and white couch-shell wear.
41. Though they give me the jewels from Indra's abode,
  Though they grant me dominion o’er earth, yea o’er heaven,
If they be not the friends of our lord Mahādēv,
  What care I for wealth by such ruined hands giv’n?
But if they love Śiva, who hides in His hair
  The river of Ga
ga, then whoe’er they be,
Foul lepers, or outcastes, yea slayers of kine,
  To them is my homage, gods are they to me.

Often the Hindu devotee asks and re-asks the fundamental question 'Who am I?', coming to the saddest of conclusions, but setting against the background of his delusive life of self the great reality of God, to worship whom is to find release from the prison-house of personality.
p. 52 p. 53
42. Thy father, mother, brethren, wife,
  Ask thyself who are they?
Thy children; yea, thy very self,
  Who art thou, canst thou say?
How cam’st thou here, how wilt depart?
  Love not this world unreal.
Ye anxious souls, this lesson learn,
  To one pure name appeal.
Our father He, crowned with the moon
  And snake. Who Him adore,
Prone lying, with ''Hail Śiva, hail,''
  In heav’n live evermore.
Our next hymn with the short-lined verses (nos. 43 to 48) is a kind of Śaivite consecration hymn, mentioning successively various parts of the body—head, eyes, cars—to be given to the worship of Śiva. Verse 46 must sound sadly to a Śaivite, for it is frequently sung in the ears of the dying, as a plaintive appeal to think of God. Verse 47 rises far above the usual ideas of future absorption to the thought of a blissful state of communion with and praise of God.
43. Head of mine, bow to Him,
  True Head, skull garlanded,
A skull was His strange begging-bowl,
  Bow low to Him, my head.
44. Eyes of mine, gaze on Him
  Who drank the dark sea's bane.
Eight arms He brandishes in dance,
  At Him agaze remain.
p. 54 p. 55
45. Ears of mine, hear His praise,
  Śiva, our flaming king.
Flaming as coral red His form:
  Ears, hear men praises sing.
46. What kinsmen in that hour
  When life departs, have we?
Who but Ku
ṭṭālam's dancing lord
  Can then our kinsman be?
47. How proud shall I be there,
  One of His heavenly host,
At His fair feet who holds the deer,
  How proud will he my boast!
48. I sought Him and I found.
  Brahm sought in vain on high.
Vish
u delved vainly underground.
  Him in my soul found I.
The mystic can never be a satisfied ceremonialist. These Śaivite devotees commonly praise the god of a particular shrine in language which might suggest that Śiva is only to be found there. And everyone who knows India remembers the ceaseless streams of pilgrims journeying to the Ganges or the Cauvery (Tamil Kāviri), to Rāmēśwaram or Cape Comorin or a hundred other holy places. But with a fine inconsistency these ancient singers sometimes point men away from externalities to a worship inward and spiritual; witness the following hymn. As to the terms used, in v. 50, Vedas are the religious works of the highest authority, Śāstras are philosophical and practical works based on them, while Vēdāngas are sciences subordinate to the Vedas, and there are six of them.
p. 56 p. 57
49. Why bathe in Gaga's stream, or Kāviri?
    Why go to Comorin in Ko
gu's land?
Why seek the waters of the sounding sea?
  Release is theirs, and theirs alone, who call
  In every place upon the Lord of all.
50. Why chant the Vedas, hear the Śāstras’ lore?
    Why daily teach the books of righteousness?
Why the Vēdāngas six say o’er and o’er?
  Release is theirs, and theirs alone, whose heart
  From thinking of its Lord shall ne’er depart.
51. Why roam the jungle, wander cities through?
    Why plague life with unstinting; penance hard?
Why eat no flesh, and gaze into the blue?
  Release is theirs, and theirs alone,
  Who cry Unceasing to the Lord of wisdom high.
52. Why fast and starve, why suffer pains austere?
    Why climb the mountains, doing penance harsh?
Why go to bathe in waters far and near?
  Release is theirs, and theirs alone, who call
  At every time upon the Lord of all.

It looks like a sudden drop when the same writer in our next hymn seems to say that everything depends upon the pronunciation of the five sacred syllables which can be translated 'Hail, Śiva!' In the later development of Śaivism the pronunciation of these syllables was exalted into a primary religious duty. But in the creative period in which these hymns were written the name probably stood for the person, so that we have here a religious 'calling upon the name of
p. 58 p. 59
the Lord' in the devotion of worship. In the first stanza there is a remarkable use of the term 'Word.' Modern Śaivites identify this 'Word' with Umā, Śiva's consort. We can compare the Sanskrit Vāk (Word) in the ig Vēda.
The last lines of verse 53 are connected in the minds of Śaivites with a story that Apparswāmi was actually sunk in the sea by Jain persecutors, with two great stones tied to him, but on crying 'Hail, Śiva! he floated to the surface.
The five products of the cow referred to in verse 54 are all used together in ceremonial purification—milk, curds, ghee, urine, and dung.
53. O Lord of Scripture, whom the Word doth help,
Celestial light of heaven, so I but praise,
With hands meetly upraised, Thy golden feet,
Then though men tie on me two weighty stones,
And sink me in the ocean's depth, e’en then
The cry 'Hail, Śiva,' would salvation be.
54. The lotus is the glory of all flowers;
The glory of all kine is Hara's use
Of that which they put forth. Glory of kings
Is the unswerving straightness of their deeds.
But if we ask the glory of the tongue,
’Tis to cry out aloud, 'Hail, Śiva, hail.'
55. For men who all renounce, ’tis glory true
To wear the sacred ash. For Brāhmans pure
The Vēdas and Vēdā
gas are their pride.
The white moon's glory is to shine serene
On the long locks of Śiva, while for us
True glory is to cry 'Hail, Śiva, hail.'
p. 60 p. 61
Tradition connects our next stanza with a story of Apparswāmi being smitten with an inward disease when he forsook Śaivism and became a Jain. Thè pain proved, says the legend, a convincing argument which reconverted him, whereupon he was promptly cured. But internal evidence proves this hymn to have been composed long after his return to Śaivism. Nandi is the name of Śiva's bull.
56. Thou takest not my deadly pain away,
  My torments, Nandi-rider, never cease;
At Thy feet would I worship night and day,
  But since my bowels writhe, and ne’er find peace,
    I can no more! O Sire, to Thee I cry,
    Who dwell’st by Ke
ila, in Athihai.

Nature sometimes spoke to our author of God. The union of sexes even in animals one day spoke to him as a revelation of divine things.
57. I'll follow those who going to the shrine their praises sound,
  With blooms and water for the god who wears the moon so mild
All lovely in His locks, a garland wreathed His neck around,
  And with Him sing they Pārvati, the mountain god's fair child.
    Once as I went to Aiyā
u, with light and reverent tread,
    I saw come two young elephants, male by loved female led,
    And in that sight I saw God's foot, saw secret things unsaid.
p. 62 p. 63
God is the great yogi, the wielder of mystic powers.
58. "O greatly loved, our King, our Lord, from all eternity,
  Our portion, our true mystic," thus from day to day I sing.
O golden one, O hill of coral, I in love of Thee
  Have wandered far and wide, Athihai Vīra
ṭṭanam's king,
Have wandered far the shining blossom of Thy foot to see.

One whole hymn, from which our next verse is taken, is a prayer for the opening of a door. Tradition has it that the great locked temple door at Vedāranyam swung open in answer to this song.
59. Umā is Thy portion, whose words are like song.
  In fair Ma
aikkāu men circle round Thee
In worship. O graciously open this door
  That we Thy true servants Thy glory may see.

Here is a very popular stanza. There used to be a beggar in Madras who recited it, and it alone, all day long.
p. 64 p. 65
60. He is ever hard to find, but He lives in the thought of the good;
He is the innermost secret of Scripture, inscrutable, unknowable;
He is honey and milk and the shining light. He is the king of the Devas,
Immanent in Vish
u, in Brahmā, in flame and in wind,
Yea in the mighty sounding sea and in the mountains.
He is the great One who chooses Perumpattapuliyūr for His own.
If there be days when my tongue. is dumb and speaks not of Him,
Let no such days be counted in the record of my life.

Whatever karma may teach of the inevitable consequence of evil, devotees hold that they may count on receiving divine forgiveness, for which the gracious nature of God is a sufficient pledge and guarantee.
61. Thy throat the black sea's poison drank, as ’twere ambrosia sweet,
  O deer-skin wearer, Umā's lord, king of the gods on high;
  Kailāsa's hill is Thine abode, and when Thy lovers cry
"Forgive our sin," great One, forgiveness is Thy duty meet;
    For with Thee is great grace, lord of celestial beings all,
    Who dwell'st in Āva
utuai, where peacocks dance and call.
p. 66 p. 67
The dreadful fate in store for irreligious men that is of being slowly killed by sore sickness, then being born again to a joyless life that circles round once more to death in unending cycles of dreariness.
The 'letters five' in no. 63 refer to the five-syllabled phrase na-mah-Śi-vā-ya, whose praise is chanted in vv. 53-55.
62. The ill-starred town without a house of God,
  Wherein white ash on no man's brow doth glow,
The town where pious praises are unsung,
  Where are no wayside shrines men's faith to show,
Where none blow joyfully the conch-shell white,
  Where spread no canopies, no flags appear,
Where none make flowery offerings ere they eat,
  Call it no town, ’tis but a jungle drear.
63. If men speak not His name in letters five,
  Nor e’er the fire-formed Śiva's praise repeat,
And never walk in reverence round His shrine,
  And pluck no flowers for offering ere they eat,
If they for healing wear no sacred ash,
  I'll tell you whereunto such men were born,
’Twas that foul plagues might torture them to death,
  Then death bring rebirths endlessly forlorn.

Our last fragment from Apparswāmi is in the minor key, in which so many of his refrains are pitched. It seems to prove, contrary to tradition, that Appar was once a married man.
64. Immersed in painful cherishing
  Of child and wedded wife,
No room is there in me to feel
  Thy power, Lord of my life.
O whereunto came I to birth?
  To cherish this false world?
Or watch it, bubble-like, appear,
  Then be to nothing hurled?